Seagate STU62001LW-S User Manual

Browse online or download User Manual for Servers Seagate STU62001LW-S. HP SureStore Ultrium 230 – Product Specifications [en]

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 31
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 0
HP Ultrium vs. IBM Ultrium vs. Seagate Ultrium vs. HP SuperDLT
Summary – Ultrium vs. SDLT
Transfer rate advantage (15 to 16MB/sec vs. 11Mb/sec) for Ultrium over SDLT. Testing
demonstrates this transfer rate advantage for most data sets.
Larger native capacity media advantage for SDLT (SDLT 110GB vs. Ultrium 100GB).
However testing shows that the more efficient data compression engine used by Ultrium
negates the larger native capacity of SDLT media and in some cases Ultrium media has a
larger useful capacity.
All drives state reliability at 250,000 hours MTBF with a 100% duty cycle. Unlikely that
the reliability winner will be seen until feedback from field available. Inspection reveals
that the buckling mechanism used by SDLT, because of the requirement to read DLTIV tapes,
is less rigid and appears less robust than the all the buckling mechanisms implemented on
the Ultrium products.
Summary – Ultrium products
HP Ultrium
strengths weaknesses
data rate matching – more efficient than
Seagate and IBM does not have it
only drive with HP OBDR
“active” head cleaning
FH drive and HH drive
family of Ultrium products
no LCD on reseller model (neither has
Seagate)
cannot perform diagnostic checks through
front panel (as is possible on IBM Ultrium)
IBM Ultrium
strengths weaknesses
family of Ultrium products
many diagnostic tests possible through
front panel with LCD
mechanical isolation of mechanism
up to 50W power requirement (double HP
Ultrium) hence no internal reseller product,
not compatible with many servers without
additional fan pack
fail modes exist with bad cartridges and
power loss during load
crude head cleaning mechanism
Seagate Ultrium
strengths weaknesses
perception of quality through appearance
of the mechanism (if covers removed)
mechanical isolation of mechanism
worst performer in tests – despite best
paper spec
no head cleaner
least positive manual load
Tarconis Comunicaciones S.A. DE C.V. www.tarconis.com [email protected] Mérida - México - Monterrey
Page view 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 30 31

Summary of Contents

Page 1 - Summary – Ultrium products

HP Ultrium vs. IBM Ultrium vs. Seagate Ultrium vs. HP SuperDLTSummary – Ultrium vs. SDLT• Transfer rate advantage (15 to 16MB/sec vs. 11Mb/sec) for U

Page 2

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 3

4 Electrical and Servo System4 Electrical and Servo System4 Electrical and Servo System4 Electrical and Servo SystemHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP U

Page 4

NotesNotesNotesNotesHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium

Page 5 - Product Comparisons

5 Read-Write Head5 Read-Write Head5 Read-Write Head5 Read-Write HeadHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium• multi-channel inductive write/MR. read

Page 6

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 7

6 Thermal Management6 Thermal Management6 Thermal Management6 Thermal ManagementHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium• mechanical and electrical s

Page 8

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 9

7 User, Automation and Diagnostic Interfaces7 User, Automation and Diagnostic Interfaces7 User, Automation and Diagnostic Interfaces7 User, Automation

Page 10

SuperDLTSuperDLTSuperDLTSuperDLT• mechanism has 3 LEDs• cartridge write protection (on /off)• drive status (on / off / flashing)• reserved• infra

Page 11

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 12 - NotesNotes

ContentsComparison of Key Published SpecificationsProduct Differentiation - MarketingProduct Comparisons1 Mechanical Design2 Cartridge Loading and Med

Page 13

8 Cleaning8 Cleaning8 Cleaning8 CleaningHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium• Head cleaning strategy is smart – not just cleaning at each load/un

Page 14

NotesThe HP Ultrium has the most efficient head cleaner implementation. The other LTO drives really relyon the cleaning cartridge for keeping the hea

Page 15

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 16

More Specification ComparisonsData below is taken from vendor’s published literature and other sourcesHPUltriumIBMUltriumSeagateUltrium SuperDLTTape S

Page 17

Ultrium 230 200 SuperDLT 220Dimensionsinternal drive(2)L = 203mmW = 146mmH = 82.5mmL = 211mmW = 149mmH = 85mmL = 211.2mmW = 149.23mmH = 86.3mmL = 203.

Page 18

HP SureStoreUltrium 230IBM Seagate Viper200HP SureStoreSuperDLT 220Operationaldry bulbtemperature range10° to 35°C 10 - 38°C 10° to 40°C(50°F to 104°F

Page 19

Reseller Product DetailsHP SureStoreUltrium 230eIBMStorageSmartUltrium TX200,T200Seagate Viper200HP SureStoreSuperDLT 220StandardWarranty3 years Expre

Page 20

Media ComparisonUltrium SuperDLTtype Metal particle PEN Advanced Metal Powder (AMP)Dimensions, Color, Weightcartridge width W = 105.4 mmL = 102.0 mmH

Page 21

Testing Results1 Cartridge CapacityThis test scheduled a backup of ~1GB to run until the backup software reported that thecartridge was full. In real

Page 22

2 Power RequirementAn incomplete set of results was acquired. Testing measured current on the 5V and 12V powerlines going into the drives. Triffid w

Page 23

Comparison of Key Published SpecificationsAll data below is taken from vendor’s published literatureHP Ultrium IBM UltriumSeagateUltrium SuperDLTPerfo

Page 24

3 Throughput TestsTesting was done using an HP NetServer LH6000 as the host. (, 2 x 550MHz Xeon processors,256MB RAM, 8 x 9.1GB, Ultra SCSI II, 7,2

Page 25

NotesOverall the HP Ultrium drive is the backup performance winner. The IBM Ultrium is the closestchallenger. Although the Seagate Ultrium has the h

Page 26 - Exchange

Product Differentiation - MarketingWhat the 4 vendors highlighted in their product literature to differentiate their products.HP Ultrium• Data Rate M

Page 27 - Media Comparison

Product Comparisons1 Mechanical DesignHP Ultrium• Mechanism made by Philips.• Single stage head position actuator• Plastic take-up reel• data rate

Page 28 - Testing Results

HP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultrium IBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumIBM UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate UltriumSeagate Ultrium Supe

Page 29 - 2 Power Requirement

2 Cartridge Loading and Media ThreadingHP Ultrium• “Soft load” with mechanical assist• 4 check states ensure that threading commences only when the

Page 30 - 3 Throughput Tests

NotesThe HP Ultrium drive has a major advantage against IBM and to a lesser extent against the Seagatedrive in media threading system. IBM Ultrium ha

Page 31 - Courtesy of/Cortesía de

3 Tape Path and Tape Control3 Tape Path and Tape Control3 Tape Path and Tape Control3 Tape Path and Tape ControlHP UltriumHP UltriumHP UltriumHP Ultri

Comments to this Manuals

No comments